fgouget at free.fr
Wed Sep 10 04:29:58 CDT 2003
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On September 8, 2003 01:23 pm, Francois Gouget wrote:
> > As far as I can see the differences between winehq.dsl and default .dsl
> Well, if we keep winehq.dsl, why do we need a perl script to patch
> the output?
We need the perl script to remove everything outside the <body> tag and
to put <!--TITLE:[Title Goes Here]--> as the first line. I'm pretty sure
this could be done by hacking the dsl file and yes, this would be much
better. But I'm sure haev no idea how and I don't have the time nor the
will to spend days researching it. Since nobody else voluntered to do it
either I wrote a script to hack the generated html file instead.
> The HTML stuff should be generated with the site
> default.dsl anyway. We should instead patch winehq.dsl to generate
> the required output instead. And it should be moved to the tools/
> CVS module as well.
Either way once make_winehq is in the tools CVS, winehq.dsl and
make_winehq can be removed from Wine's CVS. However I think we should
keep Wine's default.dsl file (just like we have a print.dsl file).
Francois Gouget fgouget at free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/
Stolen from an Internet user:
"f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng !"
More information about the wine-devel