load library problem

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On September 14, 2003 03:07 am, Eric Pouech wrote:
> Another issue could be the (.so) dependencies on wine-calendar.dll.so
> which cannot be resolved.

I think you mean calendar-wrap.dll.so. Hmm, that would be very odd.
Do you see any problem with these:

[dimi at dimi calendar]$ ldd calendar.exe.so
        libwine.so => /usr/local/lib/libwine.so (0x40029000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40040000)
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x40044000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x400f8000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4011a000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
[dimi at dimi calendar]$ ldd calendar-wrap.dll.so
        libwine.so => /usr/local/lib/libwine.so (0x402f5000)
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x4030c000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x403bf000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x403e2000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x403ea000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)

It seems to me calendar-wrap.dll.so has the same dependencies
as calendar.exe.so (in a bit different order, does it matter?)

-- 
Dimi.