Backtrace Dumps

[Alexandre Julliard]

Robert Shearman <rob at codeweavers.com> writes:

> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>
>>Well, I can also imagine a lot of cases where the in-process backtrace
>>won't work right, the main one being that since the code will never be
>>used unless you want a backtrace, when you try to use it you'll
>>realize that it no longer works, or doesn't even compile anymore. If
>>we call the debugger instead, it will use the standard backtrace code
>>which is always compiled in, and regularly used by a lot of people.
> 
> Do you want me to write a unit test that uses it then?

No, the backtrace should be done by the debugger.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org