mixing SHELL32.DLL and SHFOLDER.DLL
saulius2 at ar.fi.lt
Mon Aug 30 13:32:29 CDT 2004
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Saulius Krasuckas <saulius2 at ar.fi.lt> writes:
> > You know it can take quite a long time, maybe several years. And I want
> > to run the apps right now.
> Then use native shfolder. And no, I don't think it would take several
> years to fix the builtins, a lot of apps work fine with them today,
> they are not that bad.
OK, I agree and hope I was too desperate here.
> > So, you basically disagree with moving SHGetFolder[AW] code from
> > shell32.dll to shfolder.dll, right?
> I don't think it's going to solve the problem. Pretty much the only
> way to make it work right in all cases is to duplicate the whole
> thing, and I don't see any good reason to do that.
I'm having problem with the aesthetics of using native dlls. The less
dlls are needed for me the better. Just it, pretty personal. And thanks
for taking your time to explain this. Jumping to the native shell32.dll.
More information about the wine-devel