Should we get rid of the wine-license list?

[Jeremy Newman]

On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 23:35 -0700, Brian Vincent wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:49:41 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun <dpaun at rogers.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 08:35:26PM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > > Looking at the archives it appears that wine-license has had very little
> > > traffic, to the point where a lot of it is probably not being read when
> > > it comes up, since people like me are not subscribed to that list.
> > 
> > Yeah, I think it we should get rid of it. It was a dead list from
> 
> I'll second the motion.  Newman?

OK, I'll take it down. Shall I remove the archives as well? Or simply
leave them for historical type purposes?

> Of course, Murphy's law says FSF will soon finish their work on GPL v3
> and maybe a new LGPL.  Then we can have the license discussion all
> over again.

Damn that Murphy.