widl function pointers
ovek at arcticnet.no
Wed Feb 11 19:33:46 CST 2004
tor, 12.02.2004 kl. 01.51 skrev Alexandre Julliard:
> Ove Kaaven <ovek at arcticnet.no> writes:
> > Incidentally, that means I also reversed his indentation suppression of
> > the arguments of these function pointers, but I don't see the "old"
> > indentation as a problem - after all, MIDL does not suppress indentation
> > of function pointer arguments, why should widl?
> > But I could probably submit a patch with Alexandre's indentation changes
> > preserved if he's really attached to it.
> I don't really care about the indentation, but the reason for the
> change was so that we could use the proper type in the METHODS macro
> without having to add special support for escaping EOLs.
Hmm, I see. After seeing that you had removed the generate-ICOM-macros
support and done a lot of other header cleanup stuff, maybe I was too
quick to assume this wouldn't be a problem. OK, guess I'll have to
create a new patch...
More information about the wine-devel