bt in traces

[Boaz Harrosh]

why can't you Just use a debugger?

Fabian Cenedese wrote:

>Hi
>
>Is it possible to output the backtrace while the program is running? I
>mean that with a new debug command e.g. wine_dbg_bt or so you
>could output not only the name of the called function and the argument
>values (as with the debug channels) but also the call stack where it
>came from. That's of course only temporarily for debugging inside
>wine. If I see that a function has a problem because the argument is
>wrong it would be much easier to find out where this came from.
>If I only want to use it inside wine it should have access to the
>call stack information, no?
>
>Thanks
>
>bye  Fabi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>