dmitry at baikal.ru
Fri Feb 20 08:53:08 CST 2004
"Fabian Cenedese" <Cenedese at indel.ch> wrote:
> For this I tested more cases on Windows and got strange results (in my view).
> VT_R4: 7.850 -> VarRound(1) -> 7.800
> VT_R4: 7.851 -> VarRound(1) -> 7.900
> Is this the binary representation (in)accuracy?
> How can I test if the rounding worked ok when the numbers may differ in
> the last (invisible) bits?
> And how should I round a currency? It's valid on Windows but I couldn't
> interpret the results. Is this some kind of fixed comma type?
dlls/oleaut32/tests/vartype.c around line 4514 has the following comment:
/* MSDN states that rounding of R4/R8 is dependent on the underlying
* bit pattern of the number and so is architecture dependent. In this
* case Wine returns .2 (which is more correct) and Native returns .3
So, I'd suggest just surround your test by todo_wine and add a comment
explaining the situation.
More information about the wine-devel