#pre5 - comdlg32 MS_VC + PSDK porting

Alexandre Julliard julliard at winehq.org
Wed Jan 7 15:48:07 CST 2004

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun at rogers.com> writes:

> In other words, by now most people have upgraded from 2.95.x.
> Apparently Dave Miller claims 2.95.x is still desirable on
> Sparc, but that's not that interesting for us. On the other
> hand, being able to compile Wine with the PSDK brings real
> value.

I frankly think that being portable to various Unix compilers is of
more value than building with the PSDK headers. I have nothing against
adding hacks to enable both, but killing our Unix portability to
support MSVC headers is not a good idea.

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.com

More information about the wine-devel mailing list