winecfg: a patch to review
cmorgan at alum.wpi.edu
Fri Jan 16 11:55:29 CST 2004
I was planning to do the same to the x11 tabsheet but wasn't sure if people
actually needed to be able to specify these options per-app. Unless there is
a good reason, like there can be with dlls, global settings seem the best for
that tab. If people think this is necessary I'll take a look at it ;-)
On Friday 16 January 2004 12:17 pm, Robert van Herk wrote:
> Kirk Ruff wrote:
> >On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 15:23, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> >>On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Robert van Herk wrote:
> >>>We (me and cmorgan) were thinking about dropping that tabsheet :-)...
> >>That's a good idea, the current UI for app-specific settings is terrible.
> >I agree it is horrible, but I wanted to try to implement something.
> >I also agree that that tab should be dropped and all handeled within
> >1 tab. At least I didn't put a lot of effort in to this. If you guys
> >have any up coming patches, any idea how long before you will be ready
> >to send them in?
> I already sent in a patch for dll specific overrides... It isn't totally
> finished though, since i forgot a few settings ;-). But anywayz, the
> current library tab sheets allows you to override dlls per application.
> As for as I know, cmorgan is doing the same to the x11drv tab sheet.
> After these two are added, I guess the appsdefault tabsheet could be
> I am not planning to start working on it again soon, since I have some
> high-prio stuff to do first. I'll probably start with it again in 'bout
> a month...
> If you feel like implementing features, pls talk to cmorgan in the
> #winehq channel on freenode. He is there quite often and afaik currently
> working on winecfg.
More information about the wine-devel