winecfg: a patch to review
cmorgan at alum.wpi.edu
Sat Jan 17 09:55:40 CST 2004
Shouldn't we be adding things that:
- Won't be obsolete in the future
- A majority of users actually need to use
I'm wondering if enough users want to configure those options to make it
worthwhile to implement. We should prioritize the functionality we need
before we can say "use winecfg" to configure wine. The rest of the features
can require the user to use regedit or edit the config file by hand.
I agree that [Version] should be an app specific setting, it is a frequently
used option. Maybe we can roll version settings and the Dll settings tab
together into an "Application" tab?
On Saturday 17 January 2004 08:09 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:03:31 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > Here is the exaustive list of per-app settings that we currently have
> > in winecfg:
> Don't forget the X11DRV settings, in particular:
> XRender vs core fonts
> are app-specific for sure, probably others. Of those you definately want
> to be able to configure Desktop mode separately, at least until Alex's
> desktop patch goes in.
> thanks -mike
More information about the wine-devel