too many functions in msvcrt20.dll?

[Chipzz]

I was looking at porting a small subset of msvcrt80.dll, and so I took a
look at msvcrt20.dll.

I first used a disassembler to get a list of the functions in the native
windows dll, ran a script over that, and then ran another script over
msvcrt20.spec.

Much to my surprise, the wine implementation has more(!!) functions than
the native dll. So, I was wondering, this screws up the index of these
functions in the list, right? Does that index actually matter?

The diff between the 2 files is attached.

With kr,

Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
                           Chipzz at ULYSSIS.Org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Baldric, you wouldn't recognize a subtle plan if it painted itself pur-
 ple and danced naked on a harpsicord singing 'subtle plans are here a-
 gain'."
-------------- next part --------------
--- msvcrt20.wine.noline	2004-07-22 08:36:26.000000000 +0200
+++ msvcrt20.exports.noline	2004-07-22 08:21:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -524,7 +524,6 @@
 _amsg_exit
 _assert
 _atodbl
-_atoi64
 _atoldbl
 _beep
 _beginthread
@@ -622,8 +621,6 @@
 _heapused
 _heapwalk
 _hypot
-_i64toa
-_i64tow
 _initterm
 _iob
 _isatty
@@ -766,7 +763,7 @@
 _safe_fprem1
 _scalb
 _searchenv
-__seh_longjmp_unwind
+__seh_longjmp_unwind at 4
 _seterrormode
 _setjmp
 _setjmp3
@@ -846,8 +843,6 @@
 _toupper
 _tzname
 _tzset
-_ui64toa
-_ui64tow
 _ultoa
 _ultow
 _umask
@@ -928,7 +923,6 @@
 _wtempnam
 _wtmpnam
 _wtoi
-_wtoi64
 _wtol
 _wunlink
 _wutime