Public domain source in wine
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org
Thu Nov 4 13:07:19 CST 2004
Michael Jung <mjung at iss.tu-darmstadt.de> writes:
> 2. A more technical question: LibTomCrypt's original sources are highly
> customizable (A lot of conditional compilation and hook-functions). Since we
> have fairly special requirements for rsaenh, I could cut down the source code
> a lot. However, this would make it harder to incorporate code from a newer
> version of libtomcrypt, once it becomes available. Which way is preferable?
> Having less code or beeing easily upgradeable?
In general having less code is preferable, assuming it's not just a
few percent less. In particular getting rid of #ifdefs is strongly
encouraged.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list