No RichEdit20A window class
truiken at gmail.com
Fri Nov 19 20:59:34 CST 2004
I just want to make sure I've got this right. So we need to implement
riched20, and then forward requests from riched32 to riched20 because
riched20 supercedes riched32?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 11:46:12 +0900, Mike McCormack <mike at codeweavers.com> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> >>which is why this code is not in WineHQ.
> > What is it exactly that is keeping this code out of wine? Just
> > curious because if it's something that just needs to be worked on, we
> > should let developers know so we can get started on that.
> The current riched32 is wrong. It should not be based on the edit
> control. While it is, no incremental improvement is possible. The code
> I sent in the previous mail is not going in to WineHQ any time soon, so
> that somebody will have motivation to fix Richedit 2.0 properly, which
> is the path forward for Richedit 1.0 also.
More information about the wine-devel