Problem roundup

[Shachar Shemesh]

Vincent Béron wrote:

>Le ven 19/11/2004 à 09:02, Mike Hearn a écrit :
>  
>
>>1) The RH9 RPMs are apparently being compiled with epoll support linked
>>    in. This is causing user pain. We should really be using dlsym here,
>>    why are we not again?
>>    
>>
>
>If you're talking about this thread
>(http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=252670), then I didn't reproduce it on my RH9 setup when I released 20041019 (I have a video card fan problem right now, so the video card in that computer is now in my main computer, so I can't test it just right now). I guess the user have a different kernel/glibc than I do (I'm using RH9+updates from RH for RH9+updates from FedoraLegacy for RH9 as of the releases of Wine). The epoll detection/support is not very robust yet it seems.
>  
>
It's not that. The problem seems to be that RH updated their glibc major 
version number. Maybe you need to create a dependency in the RPM for a 
specific glibc version (>=2.3?). That's the reason my original epoll 
patch was using syscall, btw.

          Shachar

-- 
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/