epoll, LSB (was: Re: Problem roundup)

Marcus Meissner meissner at suse.de
Sun Nov 21 16:34:54 CST 2004

On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 05:19:42PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 04:38:31PM -0500, Vincent Béron wrote:
> > I never claimed there's a big speed advantage between the 3 builds. But
> > since I (for myself) prepare the athlon one, and at least the i386 one
> > for everybody else, I may as well prepare the i686 one.
> I think this is a problem: we have too many builds, and that's
> confusing. Let's just have the i386 one (with the Athlon optimizations)
> and be done with it. The download page is getting crazy, and we
> get too little benefit from all of these optimizations to justify
> the (user visible) complexity.
> Besides, we're still alpha, this type of optimizations are the
> least of our concerns, really.


Algorithmic changes (like using epoll ;) are bound to bring
way more speedups than silly compiler flags.

Ciao, Marcus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20041121/f567ba91/attachment.pgp

More information about the wine-devel mailing list