epoll, LSB (was: Re: Problem roundup)

Vincent Béron vberon at mecano.gme.usherb.ca
Sun Nov 21 16:52:03 CST 2004

Le dim 21/11/2004 à 17:19, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 04:38:31PM -0500, Vincent Béron wrote:
> > I never claimed there's a big speed advantage between the 3 builds. But
> > since I (for myself) prepare the athlon one, and at least the i386 one
> > for everybody else, I may as well prepare the i686 one.
> I think this is a problem: we have too many builds, and that's
> confusing. Let's just have the i386 one (with the Athlon optimizations)
> and be done with it. The download page is getting crazy, and we
> get too little benefit from all of these optimizations to justify
> the (user visible) complexity.

Could we show (our own pages) where users could choose distro, then
distro version, then actual package? Instead of pointing them to a few
screenful of files directly...

Another way to tackle it would be with the distro version not only in
the filename but in the release name also (20041019 Fedora Core 2, then
underneath it the list of corresponding packages).

Other ideas?


More information about the wine-devel mailing list