epoll, LSB (was: Re: Problem roundup)

Adam Babcock ababcock at sympatico.ca
Sun Nov 21 18:04:08 CST 2004


Vincent Béron wrote:

>Le dim 21/11/2004 à 17:19, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
>  
>
>>On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 04:38:31PM -0500, Vincent Béron wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I never claimed there's a big speed advantage between the 3 builds. But
>>>since I (for myself) prepare the athlon one, and at least the i386 one
>>>for everybody else, I may as well prepare the i686 one.
>>>      
>>>
>>I think this is a problem: we have too many builds, and that's
>>confusing. Let's just have the i386 one (with the Athlon optimizations)
>>and be done with it. The download page is getting crazy, and we
>>get too little benefit from all of these optimizations to justify
>>the (user visible) complexity.
>>    
>>
>
>Could we show (our own pages) where users could choose distro, then
>distro version, then actual package? Instead of pointing them to a few
>screenful of files directly...
>
>Another way to tackle it would be with the distro version not only in
>the filename but in the release name also (20041019 Fedora Core 2, then
>underneath it the list of corresponding packages).
>
>Other ideas?
>
>Vincent
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Perhaps a form structure similar to the one used to select download 
version on Nvidia's website is what you are interested in?



More information about the wine-devel mailing list