fgouget at free.fr
Tue Nov 23 07:07:59 CST 2004
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2004 10:21, Francois Gouget wrote:
>>> I'm sure we will be needing many of those newer APIs. Is there any
>>> chance for you to upgrade your lcms.h to 1.13?
>> A better solution would probably be to check for one of the newer APIs
>> in configure.ac (or the LCMSICCPROFILE structure if that is possible).
> That's another solution but I'm not sure if it's a *better* solution. It
> will mean that Gerald won't see any compiler errors, but it will also mean
> he builds an MSCMS dll without or with limited lcms support. At this stage
> of development I don't think it's reasonable to try to support an old
> version of lcms that has only half of the APIs compared to the latest.
What I meant is that we should check for one of these new APIs that we
need, and if we don't find it we should just do as if lcms.h was
I.e. if your lcms library is too old, then Wine won't use it at all.
That should keep things pretty much as simple as now, while avoiding
compilation errors for people with old libraries.
Francois Gouget fgouget at free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/
Linux: Because rebooting is for adding new hardware
More information about the wine-devel