[Wine] Edit Windows XP registry with wines regedit?

[Shachar Shemesh]

Saulius Krasuckas wrote:

>I hope there would be no license [2] collisions.
>  
>
You meant to say that you hope that the license collisions are resolvable.

The current license is not LGPL compatible due to the "no making money" 
clause. The "docs" credit is also not LGPL compatible. However, the 
author also says:

>If you ask I will very likely allow other types of distribution.
>(have already had questions of it as a bonus on eBay auctions.
> ask, and you will likely get permission)
>I'm just a kind of control freak, so I want to know what's going on.
>
which gives hope that if you ask him nicely, he will be willing to 
relicense the relevant parts as LGPL.

>[2] http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/COPYING.txt
>  
>
             Shachar
p.s.
The "no commercial distribution" runs counter to item 1 of the open 
source definition (http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php). This 
means that this license is not an open source license. One has, of 
course, every justification for saying "so what", but I just wanted to 
mention this.

       Sh.

-- 
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
http://www.lingnu.com/