MSCMS: new dll

[Boaz Harrosh]

Mike Hearn wrote:

> For what it's worth I don't think we should start excluding new DLLs 
> from the tree until they reach maturity (what is mature anyway?). If 
> they aren't in there people probably won't hack on them.
>
> The flip side is then we end up with a ton of stub DLLs and programs 
> that could work in its absence now break. This is a danger whenever 
> you add stubs, it's happened with function stubs as well.

Also maybe these DLLs can Just be excluded from the "make Install". 
There should be 2 DLL templates (in Makfile) one for installable DLL and 
one for not-installable. The packagers should make it a rule to only 
include Installable DLLs.