secur32: add first SSPI test to actually see what work needs to be done
blin at gmx.net
Wed Aug 3 05:05:24 CDT 2005
* Kai Blin <blin at gmx.net> [03/08/05, 02:03:27]:
> + sec_status = QuerySecurityPackageInfo( sec_pkg_name, &pkg_info);
> + ok((long)sec_status >= 0L, "Return value of QuerySecurityPackageInfo should be >= 0, but is %ld\n", (long)sec_status);
Never mind that. After running the tests on Win32, I realized I needed
to check for SEC_E_OK, not 0. I'll resubmit the patch.
Kai Blin, (blin at gmx dot net)
"It might help if we ran the MBA's out of Washington."
-- Admiral Grace Hopper
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20050803/0e990ed4/attachment.pgp
More information about the wine-devel