Alexandre Julliard : server: Added access rights mapping to synchronization objects.

[Robert Shearman]

Alexandre Julliard wrote:

>Robert Shearman <rob at codeweavers.com> writes:
>
>  
>
>>Why did you decide to rely on another function to map the access rights? 
>>It seems that none of the objects' mappings depend on any state in the 
>>object, so couldn't you have just put the access rights that 
>>GENERIC_READ, GENERIC_WRITE, GENERIC_EXECUTE and GENERIC_ALL map to 
>>somewhere associated with the object and have just one mapping function.
>>    
>>
>
>I think it's cleaner to use functions in the ops structure rather than
>starting to mix various data pointers in there too.
>

How about adding a new structure that contains the ops structure and the 
data then to not mix them then?

-- 
Rob Shearman