has the LGPL licence fell through ?
jwhite at winehq.org
Tue Dec 20 17:08:52 CST 2005
> It is not a requirement that patches be submitted - only that source code be
> made available. Patches are normally submitted because it is more convenient
> for the developer if the change is in the canonical version. If the developer
> does not see the value of having their patch in the canonical tree, they will
> not (and are not required to) submit it.
In fact, the only person that can demand anything wrt the LGPL is
someone that is running their software. So if someone has bought
a copy of TurboLinux 11 in Japan, they have the right to demand
a copy of the source code to the Wine bits in Project David; presumably
they'd have to ask Turbo Linux.
Be great if someone would do that...
More information about the wine-devel