Making builtin OLE32 work right
mike at codeweavers.com
Sat Feb 19 02:10:25 CST 2005
Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Well If I can get around to submitting my "new bugzilla integration"
> patch this could work right. The idea is to be able to attach multiple
> apps (versions) to the same bug. Right now we use "url" in Bugzilla to
> attach a bug to an app and that limits us to on app per bug.
Yeah, that would be neat. I'd like to have a meta bug, say "Make OLE
work", and then add all the applications that don't work as bugs under
that meta bug.
I thought a checkbox might work too... a single click that somebody can
set to show that the app works with builtin OLE or not. Maybe that
could add the app to the metabug somehow?
> The feature you want is to be able to click on a link in a bug and see
> all the applications that that bug affects.
Well, kind of. I want the app db to tell me all stuff that's not
working with builtin ole32. (later possibly other dlls).
> I know exactly what I want it to do. I even have a bit rotted (almost)
> working version on my old machine. The problem I currently have is
> trying to keep up with the changes that Jon has been doing ( I don't
> work nearly as fast as him) so I have been waiting for the database to
> stablize a bit ...
OK. I'm sure that Jon would help you out. This change would help to
leverage the appdb for developers, not just for users.
I'm a bit worried that our users are content to use native Windows dlls,
which doesn't help achieve Wine's goals.
More information about the wine-devel