[user32/tests/sysparams.c] Check for availability
paul.vriens at xs4all.nl
Wed Jan 26 07:30:00 CST 2005
>>>>jchevrier at nexicom.net wrote:
> Yeah, you can't go wrong there (adding a trace after the call). I am
> more interested in finding out why a call isn't implemented in one copy
> of Windows 98SE but is in another. Currently in the tests a fair number
> are executed without checking for an error code. This is due to the
> assumption that they are implemented on all recent versions of Windows
> (95, 98, NT, 2000, etc). Finding calls here and there not being
> implemented on versions of Windows that should have them throws a wrench
> into that. We should probably just check the error code on all calls
> (whether they're expected to pass on all platforms or not).
If time permits (or if you beat me to it) I will create a patch that adds
a check after each call. That way we can be sure we show actual info.
More information about the wine-devel