Bug in dlls/comctl32/comctl32undoc.c
felix.nawothnig at t-online.de
Fri Jul 1 19:59:22 CDT 2005
Sascha Cunz wrote:
> In lines 1944 and 1977 of dlls/comctl32/comctl32undoc.c the value "0x7FFF" is
> used to check for the boundary of a 32 bit integer. However, there should be
> used MAX_INT instead.
I somehow doubt that this function will ever encounter an INT greater
than MAX_INT... :)
Anyway, I agree that the current behaviour looks at least suspicious.
It was implemented by Dimi Paun in 2002
However, it seems it was or is just hiding another bug - I did some
testing on Win95, Win98 and Win2k3 and I can't reproduce that behaviour
- lists with >0x8000 elements seem to work just fine.
And since those functions are fairly generic and documented for several
years now it's quite possible that third-party apps use them for arrays
with more than 0x8000 elements...
> By the way: Looking at current MSDN, DPA and DSA looks rather documented than
> "undoc" :-)
Right (they were undocumented for a long time though).
I'm working on it.
More information about the wine-devel