Wrapping around stdcall

Felix Nawothnig felix.nawothnig at t-online.de
Tue Jul 5 16:12:55 CDT 2005


Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On second thought... What about abusing the "regparm(3)" attribute for this.
> 
> It gets eax, edx, ecx, stackparam1, stackparam2, ...
> 
> So what about using a construct like this (cloaked in some macros)?
> 
> #define THISCALL0(name,this) __thiscall_#name(int unused_eax,int unused_edx, void *this)
> #define THISCALL1(name,this,p1) __thiscall_#name(int unused_eax,int unused_edx, void *this, int p1)

I'm sure you meant to include the regparm attribute in the macro? :)

I admit that it looks better than the current hack - but it's still a 
hack... I'd still prefer a long-term solution in GCC.

Felix



More information about the wine-devel mailing list