[wine] Soliciting suggestions for AppDB
Mitchell Mebane
mmebane at ev1.net
Mon Jun 27 21:52:55 CDT 2005
Chris Morgan wrote:
>The patch needed some minor changes and clarifications. I haven't
>received a resubmission yet.
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>On 6/27/05, Mitchell Mebane <mmebane at ev1.net> wrote:
>
>
>> David Lee Lambert wrote:
>> On Wednesday 08 June 2005 08:32 pm, Mitchell Mebane wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm putting together a Summer of Code proposal for working on the AppDB.
>>I've been talking with Chris Morgan, and he has a few suggestions, but I
>>was looking for more. Does anybody have any features they'd like added
>>to the AppDB, quirks they'd like worked out, or things of that nature?
>>
>> I have some ideas about the AppDB, but I've been working on some of them
>>myself, and others really need the approval of the WinHQ webmaster more than
>>anything. Still, I'd like to hear what other people think of them:
>>
>>1. The AppDB, Bugzilla and the Wiki ought to send last-modified information
>>for most of their pages. This would speed things up, in some cases, for
>>dialup users, but the real advantage would be as protection against a
>>slashdotting or onslaught of AOL users. Many of the pages also send other
>>headers that prevent caching of positive lookups.
>>
>>Today I sent a patch to the AppDB maintainer to do this for images, which
>>are
>>probably the biggest performance hit (they cause the AppDB main page to take
>>about 30 seconds to load over a dialup connection). However, almost any
>>page in each of these databases could in theory be cached. Bugzilla bug
>>display pages already display a "Last modified" datum in the text of the
>>page, and so do Wiki pages (bug 2889 mentions this).
>>
>>Several of the AppDB tables already have TIMESTAMP columns, so I was
>>planning
>>to write some code to just gather them all together and send the latest one
>>as the last-modified date. The only problem is that if a page contains an
>>item which is then deleted, its timestamp will go backwards.
>>
>>
>> David,
>>
>> I don't see this patch on wine-patches. Did you send this in?
>>
>>
>> --Mitchell Mebane
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>I find that a great part of the information I have was acquired by looking
>>up something and finding something else on the way.
>>-- Franklin P. Adams
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>.
>
>
>
If you don't hear from him, please send me his patch and your notes and
I'll take a look at it.
--Mitchell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20050627/2efb4761/attachment.htm
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list