Missing HAVE_V4L2 check

[Maarten Lankhorst]

James Hawkins wrote:

>On 5/5/05, Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>HAVE_V4L2 is not declared in wine itself, but by
>>/usr/include/linux/videodev.h, which includes videodev2.h and defines
>>HAVE_V4L2 if V4L2 is available, so in my opinion it doesn't need fixing..
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Maybe we can have our cake and eat it too.  Would it work to create
>our own HAVE_V4L2 (or use our own wine-specific name) with the
>respective checks in configure.ac and the macro declaration in
>include/config.h?  The check would be whatever is needed to determine
>if V4L2 is available, like checking for the right header.  We could
>then use our own check instead of depending on the V4L2 lib telling us
>if it's available.
>
>  
>
If you want to write a patch go ahead, requirements for videodev2.h are 
exactly the same, but on the kernel versions I tested this with it would 
include videodev2.. but a check can't hurt