APPDB: Half-Life and Counter-Strike with WINE

[David F. Colwell]

Hiji wrote:

>--- "David F. Colwell" <dfcolwell at dfcolwell.com>
>wrote:
>  
>
>>Hiji et al,
>>
>>Couldn't find Half-Life or Counter-Strike in the DB
>>yet they returned...
>>
>>Submitted version rejected
>>
>>    
>>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>  
>
>>The version you submitted ( 1.0.0.0) has been
>>rejected.This application is already in the
>>database.  If you are interested in helping out with
>>the howto please sign up to be a maintainer of the
>>application.  Thanks.
>>We appreciate your help in making the Version
>>Database better for all users.
>>
>>Best regards.
>>The AppDB team
>>http://www.winehq.org/
>>
>>
>>I did my part.  :-)
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>On Monday 09 May 2005 7:40 pm, Hiji wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Any ideas?  (I'm forwarding the message, so, it
>>>defaults to showing below my message.  Sorry!) :(
>>>      
>>>
>
>--- Chris Morgan <cmorgan at alum.wpi.edu> wrote:
>  
>
>>I plugged 'half-life' into the search box and got:
>>
>>http://appdb.winehq.org/search.php?q=half-life
>>
>>Looks like its working here.  What did you search
>>for?
>>
>>I just added 'halflife' as a keyword to the
>>half-life application so searching 
>>for 'halflife' also returns the appropriate results.
>>
>>Chris
>>    
>>
>
>I found it too, but I believe the problem was that he
>was trying to add a specific version (1.0.0.0), and he
>got the error.  The versions I see on there are
>1.1.0.8 and 1.1.1.0
>
>David, can you elaborate for us?
>
>Hiji
>
>
>		
>Yahoo! Mail
>Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
>http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
>
>
>  
>
Roger that.  I have version 1.0.0.0 of CS and submitted it as such.  I 
entered version "1" of HL having not readily found the version.  After 
more searching I now find I have version 1.0.0.9  Nevertheless, should 
the CS have been rejected?  I see the DB now and I probably didn't 
submit well.  I pasted my original mail to wine-users at winehq.org in the 
description portion of the form and then got lazy and said "see above" 
in the following section.