fix for #3219
eric.pouech at wanadoo.fr
Thu Oct 20 08:34:51 CDT 2005
why not test for '?' and '.' which are the forms we know off, instead of letting the door ajar ?
> Message du 19/10/05 18:27
> De : "Vijay Kiran Kamuju"
> A : "Hans Leidekker" , wine-devel at winehq.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: fix for #3219
> I have kept it there incase of regressions
> We can just easily uncomment and test.
> On 10/19/05, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 October 2005 09:19, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> > > - /* MS mangled names always begin with '?' */
> > > - if (*sym->current != '?') return FALSE;
> > > + /* MS mangled names always begin with '?'
> > > + if (*sym->current != '?') return FALSE; */
> > It's better to remove code then disabling it
> > this way. We can always refer to CVS history.
> > -Hans
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the wine-devel