fix for #3219

[Eric POUECH]

why not test for '?' and '.' which are the forms we know off, instead of letting the door ajar ?
A+




> Message du 19/10/05 18:27
> De : "Vijay Kiran Kamuju" 
> A : "Hans Leidekker" , wine-devel at winehq.org
> Copie à : 
> Objet : Re: fix for #3219
> 
> I have kept it there incase of regressions
> We can just easily uncomment and test.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vijay
> 
> On 10/19/05, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 October 2005 09:19, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> >
> > > - /* MS mangled names always begin with '?' */
> > > - if (*sym->current != '?') return FALSE;
> > > + /* MS mangled names always begin with '?'
> > > + if (*sym->current != '?') return FALSE; */
> >
> > It's better to remove code then disabling it
> > this way. We can always refer to CVS history.
> >
> > -Hans
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20051020/e40816df/attachment.htm