Need ideas about ntoskrnl
Francois Gouget
fgouget at free.fr
Tue Sep 6 08:34:44 CDT 2005
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Peter Beutner <p.beutner at gmx.net> writes:
>
>> Any reasons given?
>
> Stability is the obvious reason. And also of course the fact that we
> have most of the code we need in ntdll already and none of it in
> wineserver.
Just trying to move things forward and understand because I'm curious:
So the way to do it would be to have ntdll load the drivers in the
process using them?
Wouldn't that cause problems if a driver expects to be able to maintain
shared information across processes?
Do we know if this is going to be a problem with the drivers we are
interested in?
--
Francois Gouget fgouget at free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/
Good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment
-- Barry LePatner
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list