Need ideas about ntoskrnl

Peter Beutner p.beutner at
Wed Sep 7 00:03:41 CDT 2005

Alexandre Julliard schrieb:
> Peter Beutner <p.beutner at> writes:
>>Any reasons given?
> Stability is the obvious reason. And also of course the fact that we
> have most of the code we need in ntdll already and none of it in
> wineserver.
Yupp most of the code maybe already in ntdll.
But imo it is quite as ugly, from a design point of view, to call ntdll
functions from inside the ntoskrnl.
It should be the other way around, shouldn't it?

More information about the wine-devel mailing list