Need ideas about ntoskrnl
p.beutner at gmx.net
Wed Sep 7 00:03:41 CDT 2005
Alexandre Julliard schrieb:
> Peter Beutner <p.beutner at gmx.net> writes:
>>Any reasons given?
> Stability is the obvious reason. And also of course the fact that we
> have most of the code we need in ntdll already and none of it in
Yupp most of the code maybe already in ntdll.
But imo it is quite as ugly, from a design point of view, to call ntdll
functions from inside the ntoskrnl.
It should be the other way around, shouldn't it?
More information about the wine-devel