Need ideas about ntoskrnl

[Peter Beutner]

Alexandre Julliard schrieb:
> Peter Beutner <p.beutner at gmx.net> writes:
> 
> 
>>Any reasons given?
> 
> Stability is the obvious reason. And also of course the fact that we
> have most of the code we need in ntdll already and none of it in
> wineserver.
> 
Yupp most of the code maybe already in ntdll.
But imo it is quite as ugly, from a design point of view, to call ntdll
functions from inside the ntoskrnl.
It should be the other way around, shouldn't it?