Need help debugging a memory corruption bug in shfldr_unixfs.c

Michael Jung mjung at
Thu Sep 8 16:36:02 CDT 2005

Hello Dimi,

On Thursday 08 September 2005 23:37, Phil Krylov wrote:
> Michael Jung <mjung at> wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be enough to call notify_click after notify_itemactivate?
> > I've attached a modification of your patch, which does just this. Seems
> > to work fine for me.
> Probably, but what if some apps depend on order in which these
> notifications are sent? (assuming we already send them in the right order)

It seems that the code in it's current form was written by you:

Do you see a problem to move the notify_click below the notify_itemactivate?

Michael Jung
mjung at

More information about the wine-devel mailing list