patches

[Ivan Leo Puoti]

Eric Pouech wrote:

> from EULA:
>
>> 1.1 General License Grant. Microsoft grants to you a personal, 
>> non-exclusive, nontransferable, royalty-free license to use the 
>> Software, and to make and use five (5) copies of the Software on one 
>> or more computers located at your premises solely for the purpose of 
>> designing, developing and testing drivers that operate in conjunction 
>> with the Software for use with Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional, 
>> Microsoft Windows 2000 Server, Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server 
>> and Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server; Microsoft Windows XP, 
>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1; Microsoft Windows Server 2003 
>> Standard Edition, Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition 
>> and Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition operating system 
>> products and any Microsoft operating system product that is a 
>> successor to any of the foregoing (each an "OS Product").
>
> isn't that enough ?
>
So on the basis of this the SDK headers we have are tainted too, and so 
are all of the wine binaries that are built with them, sounds like we're 
pretty screwed. We already have DDK headers anyway, the DDK and DDK are 
licenced under very similar terms, so we can either have both or none.

Ivan.