patches

[Eric Pouech]

Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit :
> Eric Pouech wrote:
> 
>> from EULA:
>>
>>> 1.1 General License Grant. Microsoft grants to you a personal, 
>>> non-exclusive, nontransferable, royalty-free license to use the 
>>> Software, and to make and use five (5) copies of the Software on one 
>>> or more computers located at your premises solely for the purpose of 
>>> designing, developing and testing drivers that operate in conjunction 
>>> with the Software for use with Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional, 
>>> Microsoft Windows 2000 Server, Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server 
>>> and Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server; Microsoft Windows XP, 
>>> Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1; Microsoft Windows Server 2003 
>>> Standard Edition, Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition 
>>> and Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition operating system 
>>> products and any Microsoft operating system product that is a 
>>> successor to any of the foregoing (each an "OS Product").
>>
>>
>> isn't that enough ?
>>
> So on the basis of this the SDK headers we have are tainted too, and so 
> are all of the wine binaries that are built with them, sounds like we're 
> pretty screwed. We already have DDK headers anyway, the DDK and DDK are 
> licenced under very similar terms, so we can either have both or none.
SDK is available on msdn (web site I mean) with most of the information we need.
A+
-- 
Eric Pouech