randy.galbraith at cox.net
Mon Sep 26 19:54:13 CDT 2005
Dan Kegel wrote:
>>Any comments on why this patch has not been commited
>Probably because it does not include a conformance test.
>If you like, you could help by turning
>into an unattended conformance test by following
>the example in
My approach to fixing bug 824 was considered sub-optimal by Alexandre.
I also agree and had intended to get back to this with a better
solution. Alexandre wants to maintain to the extent possible textual
representation of registry data. I now believe the right approach is to
simply always explicitly record ascii zeros as '\0' and consistently not
consider the end-of-string null terminator as part of the registry
data. Alas, I've had no time to test out this approach.
More information about the wine-devel