Coverity doing scans of Wine codebase!
Troy Rollo
wine at troy.rollo.name
Thu Apr 6 20:31:33 CDT 2006
Some of the "bugs" it picks up are cases of defensive programming, such as
checking for a NULL pointer even though the NULL pointer is impossible, given
the functioning of routines that are being called. What should the policy be
on such bugs - should we remove the unnecessary check or keep the
extra-defensive code?
--
Troy Rollo - wine at troy.rollo.name
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list