abort if WINEDEBUG requests functionality that was disabled at configure time

Segin segin2005 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 16 12:08:21 CDT 2006

Mike Hearn wrote:

>On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:37:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>if wine is built with --disable-trace or --disable-debug, then using WINEDEBUG 
>>will accept the respective options without complaining and without actually 
>>showing any useful information
>Why would anybody build without tracing anyway? I would be *very*
>surprised if it led to any noticable/real world performance improvement.
>Rather than do this why not just restore your packages configure switches
>to the upstream defaults?
It's because some people are Gentoo zealots whose CFLAGS are "-O9 
--omfg-optimize -march=8088"

Don't ask why people such stupid things...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20060416/314073e1/attachment.htm

More information about the wine-devel mailing list