Wine and Photoshop in news

[Scott Ritchie]

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 18:10 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> I'm going to CC the author of the article here, as it looks like he's
> using my packages.
> 
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:58 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > On 8/1/06, Jaap Stolk <jwstolk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 8/1/06, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <infyquest at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > ....business05_aug01_2006
> > >
> > > "with the latest beta version being 0.9.8"
> > >
> > > is this a re-print or something?
> > 
> > It's fresh, but with typos, I think.  There were backslashes
> > missing in a path; maybe there's a 1 missing from 0.9.18...
> > 
> > 
> Actually, I don't think it's a typo.  0.9.8 is the version that's in the
> Ubuntu default repositories (which is how he seems to have installed
> it), which are frozen.
> 
> 0.9.18 is the latest version I have packaged, however.  I wonder if he's
> using the later packages available from winehq, or if the review was
> written with the default version in the repositories?  He's clearly been
> on the Ubuntu forums, where it's pretty easy to discover the winehq APT
> repository:
> 
> http://winehq.org/site/download-deb

After contacting the author of the article, it seems as though he was
using the version of Wine in the default repositories, which is 0.9.9
(and not 0.9.8 as I originally thought).

Thanks,
Scott Ritchie