[UPDATE] RFC: XEmbed System Tray Patches

Alexandre Julliard julliard at winehq.org
Fri Aug 11 15:20:55 CDT 2006

James Liggett <jrliggett at cox.net> writes:

> That was the original plan, but I had some concerns about whether or not
> Alexandre would take this or not. When Rob Shearman tried to get these
> in last year, Alexandre asked him why it was necessary. At the time Rob
> said that without that call, the icons that docked were only 1 pixel
> wide. Now that isn't the case--without the call the icon width is
> perfectly fine, but docking isn't as reliable. Besides, doing an XSync
> is part of the canonical recipe for sending X events. Regardless, you've
> got a valid point--it does seem a little odd that this isn't part of
> patch #5. I think I'll try to work this in for the next update of these
> patches. 

XSync is very bad on remote links, and it shouldn't be necessary. If
it behaves better with it there's a problem somewhere.

Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.org

More information about the wine-devel mailing list