[5/5] usp10: remote todo_wine

Clinton Stimpson cjstimpson at utwire.net
Fri Dec 15 00:38:28 CST 2006

Ok.  There are 4 functions that have to be implemented at the same time 
in order to not break any tests, because of how the tests were written.
A few days ago, I sent a single patch that implemented those 4 
functions, including an update of the tests.
It wasn't accepted, and it was suggested to break the patch up.  But, I 
can't break it up without breaking the tests.
I do have more patches coming after this batch, and those will be 
smaller and atomic.

So I guess I'm back to asking why my original patch wasn't accepted.  ??
Should I resend it?


James Hawkins wrote:
> On 12/14/06, Clinton Stimpson <cjstimpson at utwire.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Part 5 of 5.
>> Remove many todo_wine's from the tests, now that the functions are
>> implemented.
> You have to remove the todo_wine's in the same patch that fixes the
> tests, or the tests will fail for at least one commit.  Patches have
> to be atomic and error free, and a failing test is an error.

More information about the wine-devel mailing list