[5/5] usp10: remote todo_wine
cjstimpson at utwire.net
Fri Dec 15 00:38:28 CST 2006
Ok. There are 4 functions that have to be implemented at the same time
in order to not break any tests, because of how the tests were written.
A few days ago, I sent a single patch that implemented those 4
functions, including an update of the tests.
It wasn't accepted, and it was suggested to break the patch up. But, I
can't break it up without breaking the tests.
I do have more patches coming after this batch, and those will be
smaller and atomic.
So I guess I'm back to asking why my original patch wasn't accepted. ??
Should I resend it?
James Hawkins wrote:
> On 12/14/06, Clinton Stimpson <cjstimpson at utwire.net> wrote:
>> Part 5 of 5.
>> Remove many todo_wine's from the tests, now that the functions are
> You have to remove the todo_wine's in the same patch that fixes the
> tests, or the tests will fail for at least one commit. Patches have
> to be atomic and error free, and a failing test is an error.
More information about the wine-devel