Fix some type definitions for the WORDS_BIGENDIAN case
dmitry at baikal.ru
Tue Jan 3 11:28:29 CST 2006
"Alexandre Julliard" <julliard at winehq.org> wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure what Microsoft is trying to achieve here either...
> It doesn't seem a very good idea to put a standard PE signature on
> big-endian files, since they are not valid PE files. The current
> approach makes it possible at some point to support loading
> little-endian PE files on big-endian machines (which I suspect is what
> Microsoft is trying to do with that define). If you swap the signature
> in builtins then you will have no way of knowing whether you need to
> swap the rest of the header.
Isn't Machine (IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_xxx) field supposed to indicate that?
More information about the wine-devel