Question regarding the Wine Vs WineLib performance
Boaz Harrosh
wine at electrozaur.com
Fri Jan 6 04:08:04 CST 2006
What are the timing for the three classes ?
Ananth M wrote:
>
>
> On 1/5/06, *wine-devel-bounces at winehq.org
> <mailto:wine-devel-bounces at winehq.org>* <wine-devel-bounces at winehq.org
> <mailto:wine-devel-bounces at winehq.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you !!
>
> I will try to compile the windows application using MinGW and check
> the performance using the same DLL.
>
> Here is the some more information that I would like to share with you
> is :
> I am using the Binary only DLL. I am not having the source for the
> DLL. SO I am not compiling the DLL in windows or in Linux. I am
> linking this binary only dll with my windows application, (since my
> application uses the function exported by this binary only DLL)
> Then I moved the executable to Linux and executed using the wine
> <windows executable>.
> I checked the execution time of the function exported by the Binary
> Only DLL
>
> In the second Case , I created the .so for the binary only dll, such
> that the functions that are exported by the binary only dll will be
> called from the stub functions exported by the .so
> Then I called the stub function (exported by .so) from my winelib
> application.
> But, In this case also, I checked the time duration for the execution
> of the dll function only.( by adding a code that gives the time
> duration, in the stub function that calls the dll function).
>
> As a third Case, I loaded the binary dll directly (without creating
> the .so), using LoadLibrary ("Binaryonlydll"), and compiled and
> linked the application using Wine supplied DLL's and header files.
> Then I called the function exported by the binary only dll directly
> from the application and checked the time duration for the execution
> of the dll function .
>
> In this case also we are getting the same timing as in Second Case,
> but we are not getting the better performance as in first case.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list