Question regarding the Wine Vs WineLib performance

Boaz Harrosh wine at electrozaur.com
Fri Jan 6 04:08:04 CST 2006


What are the timing for the three classes ?

Ananth M wrote:
>
>
> On 1/5/06, *wine-devel-bounces at winehq.org 
> <mailto:wine-devel-bounces at winehq.org>* <wine-devel-bounces at winehq.org 
> <mailto:wine-devel-bounces at winehq.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you !!
>
> I will try to compile the windows application using MinGW and check 
> the performance using the same DLL.
>
> Here is the some more information that I would like to share with you  
> is :
>  I am using the Binary only DLL. I am not having the source for the 
> DLL. SO I am not compiling the DLL in windows or in Linux. I am 
> linking this binary only dll with my windows application, (since my 
> application uses the function exported by this binary only DLL)
> Then I moved the executable to Linux and executed using the wine 
> <windows executable>.
> I checked the execution time of  the function exported by the Binary 
> Only DLL
>
> In the second Case , I created the .so for the binary only dll, such 
> that the functions that are exported by the binary only dll will be 
> called from the stub functions exported by the .so
> Then I called the stub function (exported by .so)  from my winelib 
> application.
> But, In this case  also, I checked the time duration for the execution 
> of the dll function only.( by adding a code that gives the time 
> duration, in the stub function that calls the dll function).
>
> As a third Case, I loaded  the binary dll directly (without creating 
> the .so),  using LoadLibrary ("Binaryonlydll"),  and compiled and 
> linked the application using Wine supplied DLL's and header files. 
> Then I called the function exported by the binary only dll directly 
> from the application  and checked the time duration for the execution 
> of  the dll function .
>
> In this case also we are  getting the same timing as in Second Case, 
> but we are not getting the better performance as in first case.
>
>  
>  
>  
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>   



More information about the wine-devel mailing list