setupapi.dll: partially implement SetupDiGetClassDevsExA

Saulius Krasuckas saulius2 at ar.fi.lt
Mon Jun 12 05:18:25 CDT 2006


* On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> * "Saulius Krasuckas" <saulius2 at ar.fi.lt> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Yes, but how would you write a test for a badly implemented 
> > > > function, when you don't know its name or even name of a DLL it 
> > > > resides in?
> > >
> > > Then by what means do you know that the API is misbehaving?
> > 
> > By the fact of my special app [*] not working in Wine ;-)
> 
> I see nothing there which shows that a test case couldn't be written.

Would you been seeing this similar way if Vincent P. hadn't made his 
discovered?
And what if this discovery was made by reverse engineering the code?

> Moreover, there is nothing there described in the 1st paragraph above.

Lets say we have got only 22 numbers of responces in the report [*].  
What would you suggest me to do?  To annoy everyone on the list during 2 
years by asking for a tutorial on how to debug dx game which draws black 
menu? ;-)

> > [*] http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081




More information about the wine-devel mailing list