Shell integration

[Mikołaj Zalewski]

Robert Shearman wrote:

> I don't think it is. I think it would be better to start off with by 
> just doing the shell integration in shell32. If a framework like this 
> is needed, then it will become obvious later on.
>
  That's true that I currently don't need it but if someones would need 
a really tight integration with a desktop environment he might need to 
load the enviroment's libraries. By keeping things in separate DLLs we 
can easly not load the libraries if the user don't use that desktop and 
not build the DLL is the libraries are not present. Also there were 
reports about running wine under MacOS X which, I guess, doesn't comply 
to freedesktop.org. So with a separate DLL it would be easier for them 
to see which code they don't need.
  But of course all that can be also done if all the code goes to 
shell32. I only thought that having separate DLLs is a cleaner approach. 
If it is not considered so I can change it.

Mikolaj Zalewski