[OT] Re: Why winetools is utterly useless, once and for all.

[Segin]

Saulius Krasuckas wrote:

>* On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Karl Lattimer wrote:
>  
>
>>And also, accusing people of having an IQ of 0 for replying to a flame 
>>isn't in the slightest constructive,
>>    
>>
Hardly. I have actually done something good. I got people to addresses 
the Winetools problem a bit early. Sure, it would have gotten adressed 
anyways, but only after enough complains come rolling in, months or 
years from now. When I sent the flame, i had a purpose, a plan, and a 
hoped outcome. The end result was nothing but good, so why shun me? I 
was just getting a matter addressed before we have no choice but to 
address it. We can't just put it off forever, you know.

>
>Yes, he didn't write any single patch yet that was accepted, still he 
>manages to joke calling one of the developers being a monkey. (Given that 
>monkeys can't even distinguish between MUAs and MTAs nowadays)
>  
>
I haven't written any patches, namely because my eariler code changes i 
find cause signal 11. Recently I am working on something that will be 
offloaded months from now (if i dont find it to be too fustrating) as a 
huge diff, so keep your eyes peeled. If it doesn't work on either of my 
systems, it's broken, and sending a diff is a waste of everybody's time.

>Being of sensitive nature I'd remove him from the list so he will find 
>appropriate lists to talk constructively in. (Be I wine-devel moderator)
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20060329/232be221/attachment.htm