Copy protection

[Kai Blin]

On Friday 06 October 2006 10:19, Tim Schmidt wrote:

> Again, works for me.  I believe the only part missing for this case is
> the simulation.  Of course, there's the added possibility that apps
> will go mucking about with data other apps care about, in which case a
> per-executable simulated device would be best.

Wouldn't that break on Windows, too? If I have have two apps that muck about 
in my mbr, I expect them both to work, so they better do whatever they do in 
a sane way. I don't see how this would be different for a simulated drive.

Cheers,
Kai

-- 
Kai Blin, <kai Dot blin At gmail Dot com>
WorldForge developer    http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer          http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin/
--
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20061006/6712d33a/attachment.pgp