kai.blin at gmail.com
Fri Oct 6 03:52:24 CDT 2006
On Friday 06 October 2006 10:19, Tim Schmidt wrote:
> Again, works for me. I believe the only part missing for this case is
> the simulation. Of course, there's the added possibility that apps
> will go mucking about with data other apps care about, in which case a
> per-executable simulated device would be best.
Wouldn't that break on Windows, too? If I have have two apps that muck about
in my mbr, I expect them both to work, so they better do whatever they do in
a sane way. I don't see how this would be different for a simulated drive.
Kai Blin, <kai Dot blin At gmail Dot com>
WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin/
Will code for cotton.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20061006/6712d33a/attachment.pgp
More information about the wine-devel