timschmidt at gmail.com
Fri Oct 6 04:03:41 CDT 2006
On 10/6/06, Kai Blin <kai.blin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday 06 October 2006 10:19, Tim Schmidt wrote:
> > Again, works for me. I believe the only part missing for this case is
> > the simulation. Of course, there's the added possibility that apps
> > will go mucking about with data other apps care about, in which case a
> > per-executable simulated device would be best.
> Wouldn't that break on Windows, too? If I have have two apps that muck about
> in my mbr, I expect them both to work, so they better do whatever they do in
> a sane way. I don't see how this would be different for a simulated drive.
Yeah. you're right. I just don't trust every app that mucks about
with the MBR to be courteous and correct ;)
More information about the wine-devel